Should surveillance cameras be allowed in public places?

Should surveillance cameras be allowed in public places?


picture by picture these criminals are being identified and arrested and we will not let any phony concerns about human rights get in the way of the publication of these pictures and the arrest of these individuals in August 2011 while the riots were still taking place in England British Prime Minister David Cameron gave his opinion on an issue that has captured the headlines in the past few years if you were to choose between security and privacy where would you stand the moral acceptability of camera surveillance systems in public places has been a recurrent theme in recent times since the 1970s surveillance cameras have become more and more feature of our streets squares and other public places the initial reasons for placing cameras in public places were related to concerns expressed by authorities and the general public alike decreasing crime increasing safety for the community as a whole and helping the police when their investigations justified the need for surveillance cameras at the same time concerns about people’s right to privacy have been voiced a recent example are the riots in England when the London police decided to publish the photos of the suspects online various media and organisations expressed their concerns that this went too far and that people’s right to privacy was in jeopardy also because some of the photos could be of people who are innocent should camera surveillance generally be allowed in public places I think there is not much left of privacy this time this this nowadays because everyone is taking their mobile telephones with them so everybody can take pictures of you or a little video if I have to choose between two of them I choose for the safety of the cameras nowadays perhaps certain security sensitive areas that are identified by a community I wouldn’t have I wouldn’t have as much of a problem how they store it and how they use it whether it’s just watching people anymore overall I think it should and I think there’s enough positive reasons i prevention of crime and and all of that which which means you shed you not everyone likes it to be on the camera because it’s not it’s not nice you never know what some some much someone’s gonna do with the camera with the video it depends sometimes I think the privacy of the human being is in danger I don’t know how to explain but yeah we shuffle things it’s okay a little bit in between I think that there should be some places where there are no cameras but in in common places like a railway station somewhere there are lots of big full pockets and so forth that kind of places there should be cameras now I’m going to say it should be allowed but I think it needs a lot more control than it gets and when I here this week there was something on the radio I heard about that they want to extend the availability of it and allow them to use from private cameras on public places it makes me very very nervous I just I don’t I don’t trust what they’re going to do with the information and I don’t trust the controls over who can who can get hold of it you

Related Posts

Atlanta BeltLine releases bid for lighting, security cameras along trail

Atlanta BeltLine releases bid for lighting, security cameras along trail

FORT FORT BENNING FORT BENNING WAS FORT BENNING WAS ALSO FORT BENNING WAS ALSO REPORTEDLY FORT BENNING WAS ALSO REPORTEDLY

Rola TX-103 Hitch Bike Rack Review – etrailer.com

Today well be reviewing the Rola TX-103 Three Bike Carrier for inch and a quarter and two-inch hitches, part number

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *